Deciding Provability of Linear Logic Formulas

نویسنده

  • Patrick Lincoln
چکیده

A great deal of insight about a logic can be derived from the study of the diiculty of deciding if a given formula is provable in that logic. Most rst order logics are undecidable and are linear time decidable with no quantiiers and no propositional symbols. However , logics diier greatly in the complexity of deciding propositional formulas. For example, rst-order classical logic is undecidable, propositional classical logic is np-complete, and constant-only classical logic is decidable in linear time. Intuitionistic logic shares the same complexity characterization as classical logic except at the propositional level, where intuitionistic logic is pspace-complete. In this survey we review the available results characterizing various fragments of linear logic. Surprises include the fact that both propositional and constant-only linear logic are undecidable. The results of these studies can be used to guide further proof-theoretic exploration, the study of semantics, and the construction of theorem provers and logic programming languages.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Infinitely many precomplete with respect to parametric expressibility classes of formulas in a provability logic of propositions

In the present paper we consider a non-tabular extension L of the well-known propositional provability logic GL together with the notion of parametric expressibility of formulas in a logic proposed by A. V. Kuznetsov. We prove that there are infinitely many precomplete with respect to parametric expressibility classes of formulas in the above mentioned logic L.

متن کامل

Provability and Interpretability Logics with Restricted Realizations

The provability logic of a theory T is the set of modal formulas, which under any arithmetical realization are provable in T . We slightly modify this notion by requiring the arithmetical realizations to come from a specified set Γ. We make an analogous modification for interpretability logics. We first studied provability logics with restricted realizations, and show that for various natural c...

متن کامل

Linear Formulas in Continuous Logic

We prove that continuous sentences preserved by the ultramean construction (a generalization of the ultraproduct construction) are exactly those sentences which are approximated by linear sentences. Continuous sentences preserved by linear elementary equivalence are exactly those sentences which are approximated in the Riesz space generated by linear sentences. Also, characterizations for linea...

متن کامل

On Kripke-style Semantics for the Provability Logic of Gödel's Proof Predicate with Quantifiers on Proofs

Kripke-style semantics is suggested for the provability logic with quantifiers on proofs corresponding to the standard Gödel proof predicate. It is proved that the set of valid formulas is decidable. The arithmetical completeness is still an open issue.

متن کامل

The Finite Model Property for Various Fragments of Linear Logic

To show that a formula A is not provable in propositional classical logic, it suuces to exhibit a nite boolean model which does not satisfy A. A similar property holds in the intuitionistic case, with Kripke models instead of boolean models (see for instance TvD88]). One says that the propositional classical logic and the propositional intuitionistic logic satisfy a nite model property. In part...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1994